From palette to purchase.
Turn a color analysis into outfits people can try on and buy, in one continuous flow.
Confidence looks good on you.
Color intelligence, virtual try-on and wardrobe building, designed around the person wearing the clothes.
3D is unavailable in this browser, so the case study shows without its animated backgrounds.
Color mismatch, uncertain fit and endless choice make online shopping feel like guesswork. Season turns those anxieties into product decisions.
Season explores how AI could read a person’s color signature from a photo, match outfits and retailers to it, and end in a fitting room where they see the look on themselves before they buy.
The study combined reports with interviews with online shoppers. The goal that came out of it: guidance without dictation. Every conversation pointed to one of three needs.
“Colors look different on my skin tone than on the site.”
“I always end up returning half of what I buy online.”
“I wish I could see how an outfit looks on me before buying.”
What shoppers said · from the empathy map
A screen can’t explain how a shade relates to the shopper’s undertone.
People want a sense of drape and proportion on their own body.
Personalization should feel explainable and adjustable.
The competitive review drew on Nordstrom, Wishi and Style DNA. The distinction Season aims for: combine color intelligence with user control and access to human styling.
Turn a color analysis into outfits people can try on and buy, in one continuous flow.
Five capabilities across Nordstrom, Wishi and Style DNA. Only Style DNA matches color; none offers a realistic try-on or wardrobe planning.
| Capability | Season | Nordstrom | Wishi | Style DNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color match (undertone-aware) | Season✓ | Nordstrom✕ | Wishi✕ | Style DNA✓ |
| 360° realistic try-on | Season✓ | Nordstrom✕ | Wishi✕ | Style DNA✕ |
| Styling guidance / outfits | Season✓ | Nordstrom◐ | Wishi✓ | Style DNA✕ |
| Saved profile + wardrobe planning | Season✓ | Nordstrom✕ | Wishi✕ | Style DNA✕ |
| Trust + privacy controls | Season✓ | Nordstrom✕ | Wishi◐ | Style DNA✕ |
26 · Fashion enthusiast · Tel Aviv
“Colors look different on my skin tone than on site. I end up buying “safe” items only because styling takes too long.”
Confident shopping, zero guesswork. A busy professional who shops mostly online, loves fashion, but hates wasting time and returning items. She needs a reliable way to find pieces that flatter her colors and shape.
The main persona, drawn from user interviews
Noa’s goal never changes: find pieces that suit her and buy them with confidence. What changes is how much guesswork the store leaves her to do on her own.
Product photos look different on her skin tone.
Buying “just in case” because fit is uncertain.
Putting looks together takes too long, so she buys safe.
Returns cost time, and the confidence doesn’t grow.
Buying safe, returning the rest
Shades are checked against her own skin tone.
Fit and drape are visible before she orders.
Looks are suggested around pieces she already owns.
Her profile and wardrobe are saved for next time.
Buying once, with confidence
Shades that suit her, every time
Fit is seen, not guessed
New pieces work with what she owns
Before the screens had a look, they had a structure. Begin the journey opens three doors. Uploading photos runs through sizes and analysis; signing in or choosing a model skips both, since the profile or the model already holds that data. All three meet at the palette, and in the fitting room an overlay swaps the model.
ScreenChoiceShortcut
Each stop on the line is a screen. Scroll to follow Noa from a first photo to a look she’s ready to buy.
She chooses how to begin: her own photos, or a model close to her.
DesignTwo doors into the same flow, so privacy never blocks the experience.
She adds two daylight photos, guided by a simple frame.
DesignClear photo guidance, and a model option for anyone who’d rather not upload.
A few measurements set her fit.
DesignOnly what fit needs; everything else is optional.
The orb blooms into her palette: her season and her best tones.
DesignThe reveal is the emotional peak, so it gets the whole screen.
She tries Look 01, switches color, size and angle, and sees where to buy it.
DesignEvery control on one screen, ending at a real retailer.
Into your colorsNow, the fitting room.
Scroll through the flow. Each state carries one design decision.
Photos or a model: both paths lead to the same fitting room.
A frame and three light tips replace a wall of instructions.
A short sizing step keeps momentum toward the reveal.
The color orb, faint through onboarding, blooms here into her palette.
Outfit, size, color, model and angle on one screen, with retailers to buy from.
The final design, desktop and mobile, side by side. Scroll or drag sideways to turn through the flow.Scroll or swipe sideways to turn through the flow.
The live Season flow end to end: a portrait set and a fit profile become a personal palette, every colour in it pulls the looks that match, and the chosen look goes to the fitting room, the bag and the retailer checkout.
The three calls that shaped the product most, what I chose, and what I let go.
Offer both: your own photos, or a model matched to your proportions.
Requiring a personal photo before anything else.
Why. A mandatory selfie is the biggest drop-off point for a styling product. A model path keeps privacy-conscious people in the flow.
Evidence · 63% expect personalization to feel accurate, transparent and controllable.
Full-screen steps, one decision per screen.
The original overlay modal with Models, Photos and Measurements tabs.
Why. The overlay hid the product behind a form and packed three tasks into tabs. Full-screen steps give each decision room and make progress visible.
Evidence · Competitor review: Wishi mixes mobile and desktop UI into confusing navigation, and Nordstrom reads as cluttered.
A soft paywall: free try-ons first, then an upgrade to premium AI engines.
Locking the fitting room behind an account from the start.
Why. People need to feel the value before paying, so the lock appears only after they’ve seen themselves in a look.
Evidence · 72% say try-on experiences increase purchase confidence.
The home experience speaks the same color language: tonal discovery, categories, top picks and retailers, all filtered through a person’s palette.
Products grouped by tone, not just by category.
Categories re-ranked to her palette.
Social inspiration in the same color story.
One place to find a look across stores.
The color orb that blooms through the flow is where the palette comes from. Primary, signal, resolve and surface leave it one by one and settle into the system.
Instrument Serif and DM Sans pair with a near-black night, warm ember and earthy seasonal hues. Desktop and mobile use layouts suited to their own interactions, and a recurring color orb grows from faint to full bloom across the flow.
A glowing S-shaped orb in warm ember tones beside a wordmark set in Instrument Serif.
Instrument Serif for editorial names and headlines. DM Sans for reading text and controls, at 600 and 400.
Primary
Signal
Resolve
Surface
Rebuilt from the live Season site: Archivo and DM Sans controls, Instrument Serif names, ember accents and squared edges. Everything below is live, so try it.
Buy the entire look from one retailer, in one checkout.
A product built on color has to work for people who see color differently, and for people who don’t want to share a photo.
Every swatch has a name and every palette a written description, so color-blind users get the full result.
Photos are used for analysis only, with a clear option to delete them, and a model path that needs no photo.
Labels on product photos keep WCAG AAWeb Content Accessibility Guidelines, level AA — the standard for colour contrast and readability. contrast with a scrim, not luck.
The breathing orb respects reduced-motion settings and never flashes.
These are targets estimated from the research, not tested results. The proposed measurement points are profile completion, try-on success, saved outfits and repeat visits.
Estimates · research-informed targets, not tested results
reach their color signature after starting onboarding
Target · completioncolor-related returns for shoppers who use the fitting room
Target · returnsfrom first photo to palette reveal
Target · time on taskresearch needs covered: Read, Match, Try
Design coverageEach target traces back to a finding from the research: colors that disappoint in person, overwhelming catalogs, and no way to try before buying. The research behind them: 56% of fashion returns stem from color or fit mismatch, 72% say try-on increases purchase confidence, and 63% expect personalization to be accurate, transparent and controllable. A moderated test on the prototype would be the first step to confirm them.
Carrying one color orb through the whole flow, faint at first and blooming at the reveal, gave the journey a visible arc.
The whole experience rests on the palette being right. I’d test the AI’s results against people’s own judgment, and against stylists, early.
I locked every visual decision in ChatGPT first, so the Figma Make build became one precise execution pass instead of rounds of trial and error.
Next: deeper hair, eye and skin analysis, A/B testing trust signals, the soft-paywall and account flow, and the new design language on every page.
This is a design case study; the outcomes above are research-based estimates, not measured results.